Your experience using needs analysis with adult learners in EFL:
The ifs, whys and hows.
Let’s start with the IFs and Hows?  
I asked how many of us used some form of Needs Analysis with our adult students and received a variety of answers.
@Shaunwilden used them in-company but not in-school in the last place he worked.
@barbsaka does NA with conversation classes too, which she believes helps with the illusion of control.
@PatrickAndrews thought that teacher observation of needs was more useful than surveys.
@rliberni assesses the needs, and wants, of her students pre-arrival, sometimes by Skype.
@sueannan: My school asks for NA from the 1-2-1 students pre-course and does 
in-class negotiations for the others. It is better to negotiate the syllabus with a class as they all 
seem to want something different!
@DebCapras sends out her NA by email to give her students time to prepare.
@Marisa_C suggested that there were more informal techniques than questionnaires and
@michaelgriffin proposed getting to know you type activities as a way of collecting NA info 
in an informal way.
@barbsaka: I try to give students what they really need in the context of what they think 
they need/want
@SaeedMobarak believed that a NA wasn’t necessary as his students trust him to deliver what 
they need. This wasn’t agreeable to everyone as some thought that this was a perfect opportunity to use a NA. He said that he gave the adult students a choice of what they wanted to learn too, 
but not so formally.
@Marisa_C made the point that it appeared that NA were used in ESP more than in school/ university classes.
Is there room for student   input in an auth way? eg grading, projects, collaborative 
or group work?
@jankenb2 would  replace discourse   analysis by using what Evan calls simulation, 
and challenge them  with case-based learning scenarios, depending on level of students.
 
<>
Now let’s look at the WHYs:
Do we work within a set framework, or use it to   create the syllabus?
 
<>
@Shaunwilden   asked whether we should do a survey to   find out what people’s needs are.
@rliberni   uses them to identify where a student   is, and to create a programme 
to   get them to where they want to be.
It was   also decided that a NA will aid the   syllabus design, although this threw up a 
whole range of questions about   whether Syllabus Design was taught to teachers these days. 
More of this   later..
 
        
@esolcourses: IMO, it's important to focus on learner needs rather than course/org  
requirements - otherwise, there is little (if any) point to doing them. 
 
@jankenb2 made a good point re different types of   NA--formal ( to help get Ss to meet standards) and informal ( to help direct  the class) When it   comes to NA how much tacit knowledge of teaching is needed ?  
 | 
  
 | 
  
 | 
What are the Difficulties?
@rliberni: I tend to assess the needs (and wants) of my students remotely before they arrive 
so I can be ready - can be risky though
@theteacherjames: I had some trouble with negotiated syllabus. "You're the teacher, 
tell us what to do!" I had to explain, "sorry, not my style!” 
@PatrickAndrews: people are not always linguistically aware of their needs. 
 
     
@barbsaka agreed, and said that her students loved to be asked about their needs  
but their perception didn’t match the reality. I think most of us had experienced this  
scenario at some time.  She mentioned that her  older kids were more aware, in many cases,  
than the adults. @michaelgriffin recommended a need for training the learners to recognise  
their needs. 
 | 
 
@esolcourses suggested that even when students do have an idea the school/teacher is 
not always placed to offer what they require.
@rliberni agreed that doing a NA during the first lesson gave the     teacher no time to prepare, 
and also takes time away from     lessons. Many tests are made to test the grammar and 
vocabulary and it isn’t always easy to test the writing.
@evanfrendo reminded us that needs are very different to wants. However,      not all 
private students are able to differentiate, although they will enter     wholeheartedly into a programme
 that has been tailored for them.  
There was also the question of Who pays the piper? This can be at     the root of many problems. 
What if the employer perceives the needs wrongly, or sets unrealistic     targets?
A discussion started about what to do when the employer insisted on     a syllabus before  the
 teacher meets the students.  
 
@esolcourses categorically     refuses to do so, and explains her reasoning to the company. 
@evanfrendo suggested making it as vague as possible, if a     provisional plan would not be 
acceptable. This would allow adaptation on meeting the students or     at least  could give an 
example     of what would be delivered.
 
@esolcourses thought that it was a waste     of the teacher’s time.     
@rliberni     had a problem where the needs of the student and the employer were at odds.
@evanfrendo reminded us that there     were many stakeholders to consider, 
including the teacher. He suggested     that the sponsors might observe a class so that everyone could agree on the     priorities.
 
     
                   
 
@theteacherjames thought he     would look for a middle way and concentrate  
on the student, while ticking     some of the employer’s boxes.  
It all boiled down to compromise! 
 What     should a Needs Analysis contain? 
@Marisa_C: should learning preferences go in a NA questionnaire?     This was seen as  
very useful, as was a way of finding out what they can, and can’t already do.@jankenb2, a new participant, said that the construction of a good Analysis requires knowledge of qualitative and quantative measures, Bloom’s taxonomy or similar, the students’ environments and required standards. Producing the right kind of questions is paramount. 
 
 | 
  
 | 
  
 |  
 
 
 | 
@  @michaelgriffin thought of a needs analysis as a menu of things for students
 to choose, select or rank for later work.  @DebCapras reminded us to check the students’ access 
to technology and their comfort level with it as well as their language needs. She suggested that it might be possible to customise an off-the-shelf- company-driven course by using a good NA.
@rliberni suggested that a NA was a great way to take a snap shot of the starting point.
@DebCapras: Design a flexible syllabus and revisit NA regularly - make sure you're on track. 
Regular feedback - not just at end
@jankenb2 :the right sort of questions are important as the NA will lead to an instructional framework.
           
              
   
     What do you do with the results? 
      Personally, I design a syllabus and then take it   back to the student for modification or agreement.  
      This provides you with a   working contract.  I also think that   you must revisit the NA later in  
      the course to see if needs have changed-as   Marisa called it ‘stocktaking’!  
      This   safeguards the teacher from problems and  any changes can be negotiated with the   student.  
       It seems that it is not unusual for students to change their   priorities in the middle of a lengthy 
       course – it was suggested that this   could be caused by: promotion, a new job, a new boss, 
       changedexpectations or   insight! @Shaunwilden pointed out that this was a problem for 
       inexperienced teachers to recognise. We came back to the   problem mentioned before:  
       What skills do our newly- qualified or still-in-training   teachers have access to?  
       @Marisa_C asked whether all teachers had test and   syllabus design skills.   @esolcourses agreed  
       that it   would be wrong to make assumptions as it was not always focussed on in   training.  
       @evanfrendo suggested that few teachers have studied discourse   analysis and would find it  
       difficult to analyse future language needs.  
       @theteacherjames   taught himself and puts it to use, designing as and when he needs to.  
       Marisa   offered to provide examples of syllabus designs done by her Delta Candidates,   providing  
        they were happy to do so as it is now covered in DELTA and DIP   level syllabi. 
 | 
  
 | 
  
 | 
A final point from @theteacherjames:  
Whatever   the result of a Needs Analysis is, we shouldn't underestimate 
the effect of   simply asking the students what they want.  
It's all too rare. 
 | 
  
 | 
  
 | 
  
 | 
                   
                   
                   
                   
      
LINKS
Syllabus Design and NA)                             http://t.co/69GicsUd  
recommended reading by michaelgriffin 
michaelegriffin  comfort survey     https://t.co/qeQM9ERP      
( this could be used as a self-assessment tool at the end of a course too)
 
 | 
  
 | 
  
 |  
C  (2009) Jonassen on how post secondary     education should structure  
lessons in argumentation. With thanks to @jankenb2 
 | 
  
 | 
  
 |  
 
 | 
  
 | 
  
 |  
 
 | 
  
 | 
  
 |  
 
 
 
 |      
  
 |  
 
 |